Cenrios De Uso

Artigo: The objective of this study is to present the methodology used to develop two scenarios from a virtual environment. Were used and adapted images from this virtual environment and taken from the Internet, as well as discussed the concepts of virtual reality, warnings, and immersion.

The importance of using scenarios in line with studies on warnings behavior is very large, especially when you need to model/select virtual involvements. Such scenarios can support reasoning about situations of use, even before these situations are created. The results obtained with this approach were the development of two different scenarios: unselfish and selfish, which have different characteristics and may involve different user behaviors.

Scenarios De Uso De

The development of these two scenarios consisted of an initial step of a research that aims to compare the two scenarios to see which of them can exert greater influence on the user facing a decision.

Scenarios are important tools to facilitate the communication among scientists, practitioners, and decision-makers, and, thus to support policy and management decisions. The use of scenarios has an enormous potential to reduce ecosystem restoration costs and to optimize benefits, but this potential remains poorly explored. Here, we recommend and illustrate six best practices to guide the use of scenarios for planning native ecosystem restoration.

We argue, first, for a participatory process to consider aspirations of multiple stakeholders along the whole scenario building process, from planning to implementation and review phases. Second, targeted restoration outcomes should be defined by key-actors (those who have direct interests in restoration) and directly involved stakeholders, within a clear socio-environmental context and under a well-defined problem statement, considering a broad range of nature and human benefits that can be derived from ecosystem restoration. Third, methodological choices, such as scenariotypes, spatial andtemporal scales,drivers,restorationrelatedvariables, andindicators, shouldbedefinedaccording to the multiple desired outcomes.

Fourth, we encourage the consideration of the interactions among variables, within a spatially explicit, and temporally dynamic multi-criteria approach. Fifth, analysis and dissemination of scenario results should highlight the trade-offs and synergies among different restoration outcomes, identifying the scenarios that maximize benefits and minimize costs and resistance (i.e. The costeffective and most feasible scenario) for multiple targets. Finally, promoting capacity building, through a wider consultation process including interaction with a broader group of stakeholders, is critical for the successful implementation and review of restoration interventions.

Scenarios that support ecosystem restoration should follow an adaptive and iterative process, aiming to continuously improve restoration interventions and outcomes. For additional informations: Renato Crouzeilles – To read the full article go to:.